Prediction of Ryan Nijboer vs Nikala Scholtz Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Nijboer vs N. Scholtz

Ryan Nijboer

NED

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

503

C. Rank

Ret.

371

Best Rank

320

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.7K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nikala Scholtz

RSA

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'11" (180 cm)

Height

503

C. Rank

Ret.

371

Best Rank

320

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.7K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Nijboer 0 - 1 Scholtz

They have played 3 sets in total, with Ryan Nijboer winning 1 and Nikala Scholtz winning 2. The last match between Nikala Scholtz and Ryan Nijboer was at the South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch), 29-11-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nijboer	0
Scholtz	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch)(11-29-17)

Stats

Nikala Scholtz

Ryan Nijboer

R. Nijboer vs N. Scholtz H2H Profile

R. Nijboer	Stats	N. Scholtz
$5,735	Career Prize Money	$4,340
56.63% (299-229)	Career Total W/L	64.58% (217-119)
0	Hard	1
3	Titles	0
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Nijboer vs N. Scholtz Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ryan Nijboer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ryan Nijboer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ryan Nijboer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikala Scholtz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ryan Nijboer has won 54.76% of matches played (W/L 46/38), with Nikala Scholtz winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ryan Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 104/72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 22% (W/L 5/18). Nikala Scholtz has their best career surface win % on , winning 59% (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /).
Player level: In the last year, Ryan Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 36/21), where as Nikala Scholtz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ryan Nijboer winning 0 times and Nikala Scholtz being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ryan Nijboer winning 1 and Nikala Scholtz winning 2.
The last match between Ryan Nijboer and Nikala Scholtz was at the South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch), 29-11-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nikala Scholtz getting the victory 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:6:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ryan Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.93 while Nikala Scholtz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ryan Nijboer has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ryan Nijboer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikala Scholtz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ryan Nijboer vs Nikala Scholtz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Nijboer vs N. Scholtz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Nijboer	Stats	N. Scholtz
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
15	Games Won	19
1	Aces (Total)	8
10	Total Double Faults	3
3:6:0	Average Match Time	3:6:0
58% (77/133)	1st Serve %	63% (66/105)
65% (50/77)	1st Serve Win %	82% (54/66)
59% (33/56)	2nd Serve Win %	54% (21/39)
33% (1/3)	Break Pts Won %	21% (3/14)
29% (30/105)	Return Points Win %	38% (50/133)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Nijboer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Madrid - 24-11-2025
R1 Benjamin Winter LopezB. Winter	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
M25 Vale do Lobo - 17-11-2025
QF Olle WallinO. Wallin	L	2-6 6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Sean HodkinS. Hodkin	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
R1 Pedro AraujoP. Araujo	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
M25 Vale do Lobo - 10-11-2025
R2 Tomas Curras AbasoloT. Curras	L	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Scholtz Recent Matches Played

Empty Result

R. Nijboer vs N. Scholtz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Nijboer	Stats	N. Scholtz
56.63% (299/229)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
56.21% (688/536)	Sets Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
52.81% (6003/5364)	Games Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
59.09% (104/72)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
57.72% (187/137)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
28.57% (8/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
239.32	Average Opponent Rank	0
20.00% (1/4)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
42.22% (38/52)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
60.05% (260/173)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
57% (292/516)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
33% (2/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
47% (66/139)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
46% (77/168)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/0)
83% (315/262)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
17% (315/53)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
17% (213/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)